Я только что установил туннель vpn сайт-сайт с strongswan (4.5). Туннель выглядит нормально и подключен к другой стороне, но, похоже, существует проблема с маршрутизацией трафика через туннель.
Любая идея?
Благодарность!
Диаграмма сети
+----------------------------------+
|Dedicated server: starfleet | +-----------------+
| | | CISCO ASA |
| +-------------------------| internet | |
| |eth0: XX.XX.XX.195/29 +-------------------| YY.YYY.YYY.155 |
| +-------------------------| +------+----------+
| |virbr1: 192.168.100.1/24 | |
| +----+--------------------| |
| | | |
| | | +-----------------+
| | | |network |
| +-------+ | | |
| | | |172.30.20.0/27 |
| | | +-----------------+
| +------------------------------+ |
| | kvm server: enterprise | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | eth0: 192.168.100.100/24 | |
| +------------------------------+ |
+----------------------------------+
Програмное обеспечение
- Debian Wheezy
- strongswan 4.5.2-1.5 + deb7u1
- kvm и libvirt (сеть 192.168.100.x)
/etc/ipsec.conf
root@starfleet ~ # cat /etc/ipsec.conf
# ipsec.conf - strongSwan IPsec configuration file
# basic configuration
config setup
plutodebug="all"
plutostderrlog=/var/log/pluto-ipsec
charonstart=no
plutostart=yes
conn net-net
ikelifetime=86400s
keylife=3600s
rekeymargin=3m
keyingtries=1
keyexchange=ikev1
authby=secret
ike=aes256-sha-modp1024!
esp=aes256-sha
right=YY.YYY.YYY.155
rightsubnet=172.30.20.0/27
left=XX.XX.XX.195
leftsubnet=192.168.100.0/24
leftfirewall=yes
pfs=no
auto=add
Ipsec вверх
root@starfleet ~ # ipsec up net-net
002 "net-net" #1: initiating Main Mode
102 "net-net" #1: STATE_MAIN_I1: initiate
003 "net-net" #1: ignoring Vendor ID payload [FRAGMENTATION c0000000]
104 "net-net" #1: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, expecting MR2
003 "net-net" #1: ignoring Vendor ID payload [Cisco-Unity]
003 "net-net" #1: received Vendor ID payload [XAUTH]
003 "net-net" #1: ignoring Vendor ID payload [###############################]
003 "net-net" #1: ignoring Vendor ID payload [Cisco VPN 3000 Series]
106 "net-net" #1: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3, expecting MR3
002 "net-net" #1: Peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: 'YY.YYY.YYY.155'
002 "net-net" #1: ISAKMP SA established
004 "net-net" #1: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP SA established
002 "net-net" #2: initiating Quick Mode PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+UP {using isakmp#1}
110 "net-net" #2: STATE_QUICK_I1: initiate
002 "net-net" #2: sent QI2, IPsec SA established {ESP=>0x8a12ab22 <0xa01abba1}
004 "net-net" #2: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, IPsec SA established {ESP=>0x8a12ab22 <0xa01abba1}
root@starfleet ~ # ipsec status
000 "net-net": 192.168.100.0/24===XX.XX.XX.195[XX.XX.XX.195]...YY.YYY.YYY.155[YY.YYY.YYY.155]===172.30.20. 0/27; erouted; eroute owner: #2
000 "net-net": newest ISAKMP SA: #1; newest IPsec SA: #2;
000
000 #2: "net-net" STATE_QUICK_I2 (sent QI2, IPsec SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 3331s; newest IPSEC; eroute owner
000 #2: "net-net" esp.8a12ab22@YY.YYY.YYY.155 (0 bytes) esp.a01abba1@XX.XX.XX.195 (0 bytes); tunnel
000 #1: "net-net" STATE_MAIN_I4 (ISAKMP SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 86050s; newest ISAKMP
000
Сетевая информация
Интерфейс tun0 используется сервером openvpn.
интерфейс virbr1 - это сеть kvm
root@starfleet ~ # ip -4 a s
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000
inet XX.XX.XX.195/29 brd XX.XX.XX.199 scope global eth0
3: tun0: <POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 100
inet 10.8.0.1 peer 10.8.0.2/32 scope global tun0
5: virbr1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
inet 192.168.100.1/24 brd 192.168.100.255 scope global virbr1
root@starfleet ~ # ip -4 r s t 0
default via XX.XX.XX.193 dev eth0
10.8.0.0/16 via 10.8.0.2 dev tun0
10.8.0.2 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 10.8.0.1
XX.XX.XX.192/29 via XX.XX.XX.193 dev eth0
XX.XX.XX.192/29 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src XX.XX.XX.195
192.168.100.0/24 dev virbr1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.100.1
local 10.8.0.1 dev tun0 table local proto kernel scope host src 10.8.0.1
broadcast XX.XX.XX.192 dev eth0 table local proto kernel scope link src XX.XX.XX.195
local XX.XX.XX.195 dev eth0 table local proto kernel scope host src XX.XX.XX.195
broadcast XX.XX.XX.199 dev eth0 table local proto kernel scope link src XX.XX.XX.195
broadcast 127.0.0.0 dev lo table local proto kernel scope link src 127.0.0.1
local 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo table local proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1
local 127.0.0.1 dev lo table local proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1
broadcast 127.255.255.255 dev lo table local proto kernel scope link src 127.0.0.1
broadcast 192.168.100.0 dev virbr1 table local proto kernel scope link src 192.168.100.1
local 192.168.100.1 dev virbr1 table local proto kernel scope host src 192.168.100.1
broadcast 192.168.100.255 dev virbr1 table local proto kernel scope link srr 192.168.100.1
root@starfleet ~ # ip xfrm state
src XX.XX.XX.195 dst YY.YYY.YYY.155
proto esp spi 0x8a12ab22 reqid 16384 mode tunnel
replay-window 32 flag af-unspec
auth-trunc hmac(sha1) 0x######################################## 96
enc cbc(aes) 0x################################################################
src YY.YYY.YYY.155 dst XX.XX.XX.195
proto esp spi 0xa01abba1 reqid 16384 mode tunnel
replay-window 32 flag af-unspec
auth-trunc hmac(sha1) 0x######################################## 96
enc cbc(aes) 0x################################################################
root@starfleet ~ # ip xfrm policy
src 192.168.100.0/24 dst 172.30.20.0/27
dir out priority 1847 ptype main
tmpl src XX.XX.XX.195 dst YY.YYY.YYY.155
proto esp reqid 16384 mode tunnel
src 172.30.20.0/27 dst 192.168.100.0/24
dir fwd priority 1847 ptype main
tmpl src YY.YYY.YYY.155 dst XX.XX.XX.195
proto esp reqid 16384 mode tunnel
src 172.30.20.0/27 dst 192.168.100.0/24
dir in priority 1847 ptype main
tmpl src YY.YYY.YYY.155 dst XX.XX.XX.195
proto esp reqid 16384 mode tunnel
src ::/0 dst ::/0
socket out priority 0 ptype main
src ::/0 dst ::/0
socket in priority 0 ptype main
src ::/0 dst ::/0
socket out priority 0 ptype main
src ::/0 dst ::/0
socket in priority 0 ptype main
src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0
socket out priority 0 ptype main
src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0
socket in priority 0 ptype main
src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0
socket out priority 0 ptype main
src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0
socket in priority 0 ptype main
root@starfleet ~ # ip route show table 220
root@starfleet ~ #
root@starfleet ~ # route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
0.0.0.0 XX.XX.XX.193 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
10.8.0.0 10.8.0.2 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0
10.8.0.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 tun0
XX.XX.XX.192 XX.XX.XX.193 255.255.255.248 UG 0 0 0 eth0
XX.XX.XX.192 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.100.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 virbr1
Iptables
root@starfleet ~ # iptables-save
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.14 on Fri May 24 16:07:39 2013
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [11:368]
:INPUT ACCEPT [1:48]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [13:1012]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [13:1012]
-A POSTROUTING -s 10.8.0.0/16 ! -d 10.8.0.0/16 -o virbr1 -j MASQUERADE
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.0/24 ! -d 192.168.100.0/24 -p tcp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.0/24 ! -d 192.168.100.0/24 -p udp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.0/24 ! -d 192.168.100.0/24 -j MASQUERADE
COMMIT
# Completed on Fri May 24 16:07:39 2013
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.14 on Fri May 24 16:07:39 2013
*mangle
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [271:19504]
:INPUT ACCEPT [261:19184]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [181:28686]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [181:28686]
-A POSTROUTING -o virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j CHECKSUM --checksum-fill
COMMIT
# Completed on Fri May 24 16:07:39 2013
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.14 on Fri May 24 16:07:39 2013
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [46:3380]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [36:5220]
-A INPUT -i virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i virbr1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i virbr1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -s 172.30.20.0/27 -d 192.168.100.0/24 -i eth0 -m policy --dir in --pol ipsec --reqid 16384 --proto esp -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -s 192.168.100.0/24 -d 172.30.20.0/27 -o eth0 -m policy --dir out --pol ipsec --reqid 16384 --proto esp -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -s 10.8.0.0/16 -o virbr1 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -i virbr1 -o tun0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -d 192.168.100.0/24 -o virbr1 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -s 192.168.100.0/24 -i virbr1 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -i virbr1 -o virbr1 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -o virbr1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
-A FORWARD -i virbr1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
COMMIT
# Completed on Fri May 24 16:07:39 2013
TcpDumping с 192.168.100.100 до 172.30.20.9
Все команды выполняются одновременно.
root@enterprise:~# ping 172.30.20.9
PING 172.30.20.9 (172.30.20.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- 172.30.20.9 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 4999ms
root@enterprise:~# tcpdump -v -n dst net 172.30.20.0/27
tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
16:23:48.919819 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
192.168.100.100 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 1, length 64
16:23:49.918949 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
192.168.100.100 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 2, length 64
16:23:50.918950 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
192.168.100.100 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 3, length 64
16:23:51.918952 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
192.168.100.100 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 4, length 64
16:23:52.918954 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
192.168.100.100 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 5, length 64
16:23:53.918951 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
192.168.100.100 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 6, length 64
root@starfleet ~ # tcpdump -v -n dst net 172.30.20.0/27
tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
16:23:50.475100 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
XX.XX.XX.195 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 1, length 64
16:23:51.474262 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
XX.XX.XX.195 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 2, length 64
16:23:52.474280 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
XX.XX.XX.195 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 3, length 64
16:23:53.474251 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
XX.XX.XX.195 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 4, length 64
16:23:54.474213 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
XX.XX.XX.195 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 5, length 64
16:23:55.474173 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
XX.XX.XX.195 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 6, length 64
источник
Моя ситуация очень похожа на описанную @telemaco. У меня есть несколько тестовых виртуальных машин, работающих на KVM на моем ноутбуке. Мой ноутбук получает свой IP-адрес через DHCP, поэтому IP-адрес конечной точки VPN назначается Strongswan моему ноутбуку через
leftsourceip=%config
.ВМ используют частную сеть
192.168.100.0/24
. Мой ноутбук (хост KVM) получает IP-адрес192.168.50.2/24
через DHCP и IP-адрес конечной точки10.0.0.10/26
от Strongswan.Виртуальные машины должны получить доступ к сети
192.168.0.0/24
, которая маршрутизируется через VPN.Основываясь на ответе, предоставленном @ecdsa, я получил это, добавив следующее правило:
В моем случае
ip xfrm policy
выглядит так (извлечение):Это означает, что только локальный IP-адрес
10.0.0.10
имеет соответствующееxfrm lookup
правило. Вот почему требуется NAT, если подсеть виртуальных машин не добавлена в IPsec.источник